Please come back later to see the best odds for today's games here.
Alex Bregman's Rebound Is Real. The Home Run Rate Is the Part That Isn't.
The Cubs third baseman has genuinely reverted to form, but the barrage of homers is outrunning the batted-ball quality underneath it, and the cause isn't the retooled swing everyone is crediting.On August 13, Alex Bregman hit three home runs and drove in a career-high seven runs against the Nationals, the first three-homer game of an eleven-year career. Not long ago he had a one-word review of his own first half: “terrible.” After signing a $175 million deal and scuffling through the season’s opening months, he now looks, in the words of the Chicago coverage, like the player the Cubs thought they were paying for, heating up exactly when a playoff push needs him.
That story is being told the same way across every outlet: a disappointment rediscovering himself, right on time. Most of it holds up. The rebound is real, it is broad, and it is earned. But two things the consensus glosses over are worth stopping on, because they change how you should read what comes next. The first is that the home run rate specifically is running ahead of the contact quality producing it. The second is that whatever fixed Bregman, the evidence does not point to the retooled swing everyone is crediting.
The rebound is real, and it isn’t one loud night
Start with the thing that is not in dispute. This is not a three-homer game masquerading as a trend. Bregman’s OPS over his last 30 games sits at .940, roughly 186 points above his career baseline; over the last 14 it is up near 1.100. The monthly climb tells the same story without any single game carrying it: an .648 OPS in June, .825 in July, and 1.100 in August. When a step up shows in the 30-game window and the two-week window and the calendar-month splits all at once, the surge has a floor under it that a hot week wouldn’t.
The clearest way to see that the improvement is structural rather than a spike is to watch the expected output climb, since expected numbers strip out the luck in any given result.
[CHART: ArticleRollingForm | Bregman's 10-game rolling xwOBA bottomed near .203 on July 24 and climbed to roughly .351 by August 12, a steady, weeks-long ascent, not a one-game spike.>
The line bottoms out at a season-low .203 on July 24 and rises, more or less without a false step, to about .351 by mid-August. That is a hitter’s underlying quality of contact recovering over weeks, not a box score that got lucky for a few days. The one honest caveat is that the very hottest slices, the last seven and fourteen games, are also the newest and narrowest, and the seven-game number is inflated by the three-homer night itself. The 30-game gain of +186 points is the more sober measure of how far he has come. But even that sober measure is a real move.
Why the slump read as noise in the first place
Here is the mechanism that makes a Bregman rebound more believable than a typical hot streak: his skill floor is genuinely high, and the high part is his eye.
[CHART: ArticlePercentileRanks | Bregman's plate discipline grades near the top of the league, 92nd-percentile chase, 94th-percentile whiff, but his barrel rate sits in the 25th percentile, capping the damage on contact.>
The top of that profile is elite. A 22.1% chase rate is 92nd percentile and his whiff rate grades in the 94th, a hitter who controls the zone and the bat that well does not suddenly forget how to hit. So when his production cratered in June, a .648 OPS, the more likely explanation was variance in a stable skill, not the erosion of it. Discipline that good is exactly the kind of foundation a hitter reverts toward. The rebound, in other words, was the expected outcome.
But read the bottom of the same chart, because it is the whole tension of this piece in one frame. His zone-swing rate is only 59.9%, 11th percentile, he takes a lot of hittable pitches, and his barrel rate sits in the 25th percentile. Elite command of the strike zone, ordinary damage on contact. The eye is a real skill. The thump is not, and that gap is where the trouble hides.
The last two weeks were harder contact, not just better luck
Before we get to the trouble, give the rebound its due on the process side. The recent results are matched by the batted balls, not floating on top of them.
[CHART: ArticleTwoWindowTrend | Over the last 14 days Bregman's contact quality has jumped above his season baseline, led by a hard 91.2-mph average exit velocity.>
The load-bearing number here is the one I trust most: a rolling 14-day average exit velocity of 91.2 mph, up from a season baseline near 88. That is a genuine step up in how hard he is hitting the ball, and it moves in step with the results rather than lagging them, which is what separates a real rebound from a mirage. The rest of the window points the same direction, with harder-hit rate and expected output rising and whiffs falling.
Two cautions keep this honest. It is roughly 45 batted balls, a small sample by nature. And it is a rebound toward his level, not past it, because at the season scale his contact quality is actually down year-over-year, with average exit velocity at 88.2 mph against 90.1 a year ago and hard-hit rate at 37.7% versus 44.4%. He is hitting the ball harder than he was in June. He is not hitting it harder than the version of himself the Cubs signed.
Not a retooled swing
This is where the popular version of the story and the evidence part ways. The prevailing explanation credits mechanics, a deep video dive, a rebuilt swing, rediscovered pull-side loft. The local beat has leaned hard into a specific version of it: that Bregman’s pull rate has climbed above 50% in the second half, including a 54.8% mark in August, and that pull-side power is the engine of the home run spike. The batted-ball direction that would actually confirm a pull-side shift isn’t something the evidence pins down, so treat that as an untested explanation rather than a settled one. And the swing metrics that would corroborate a mechanical overhaul don’t.
[CHART: ArticleYoYBars | Bregman's bat speed is down about 1.2 mph year-over-year and swing length and launch angle are flat, while exit velocity and hard-hit rate have declined, no mechanical signature of a rebuilt swing.>
A genuine swing rebuild leaves fingerprints: bat speed and swing length moving together, launch angle rising if the story is added loft, contact quality climbing to match. None of that is here. Bat speed is down about 1.2 mph year-over-year, to 69.8. Swing length is flat at 7.1 feet. Launch angle is essentially unchanged at 16.9 degrees, and season contact quality is down, not up. If Bregman had rebuilt his swing to lift the ball, these inputs would show it. They show a hitter who got his timing and his contact back, a return to form, not one who found a new gear. That distinction matters, because a rebuilt swing would argue the new power is here to stay. A timing rebound makes no such promise.
The catch: the power is outrunning the batted ball
Which brings us to the one place the results are genuinely ahead of the process, and it is a specific place, not the whole line. Bregman is slugging .409 against an expected .362; the official expected-stats line puts it at .365. Either way, that is a gap of roughly 44 to 47 points, and it sits well above the 20-point threshold where power regression starts to look like a real risk rather than noise. Underneath it is that 25th-percentile barrel rate, a modest damage metric for a slugging line this loud.
The three-homer night against Washington is the loudest face of exactly that gap, a burst of home run power arriving faster than the contact quality beneath it can vouch for.
[VIDEO: 8Bop9wVLeNM | Bregman’s three-homer game on 8/13 is the home-run barrage this article dissects, the exact power spike we argue is outrunning his expected slugging by ~0.044 to 0.047.>
The important nuance is that the rest of the profile is close to deserved. His weighted on-base is only 13 points above expected, his batting average about where it should be, and his BABIP is essentially neutral, .280 against a .281 expectation. So this is not a hitter whose whole line is a house of cards.
[CHART: ArticleDumbbellChart | Bregman's slugging sits ~45 to 47 points above his expected SLG, but his wOBA and BABIP are essentially where they should be, the overperformance is specific to power, not the whole line.>
The chart makes the shape of it plain: batting average, on-base value and BABIP all sit right on top of their expected marks, and only slugging pulls away. The batting rebound is real and earned. The home run rate is the one component running on credit. Given a barrel rate in the 25th percentile, the honest expectation is that the homers cool toward the contact underneath them, even as the hits keep coming.
A soft schedule buys some time
Two matchup notes round out the read, and they cut in opposite directions. The good news for the near term: the two-week surge did not come against a soft slate. Opposing starters over that stretch carried a 4.09 ERA against his season average of 4.43, and the quality of contact they’d allowed was essentially league-average, average-or-tougher pitching, not a run of batting-practice arms. The three-homer night is the exception that proves the point, coming against a bottom-tier starter in Jackson Kent and his 6.75 ERA.
The upcoming schedule is softer, with the next couple of weeks grading below average by starter quality, and that is a tailwind. But it comes with Bregman’s own split as a caution: he has punished bottom-third pitching to the tune of an .876 OPS this year while managing just .691 against the top third, a 185-point gap. Part of that is real, he does more damage against lesser arms, and part is results noise, since the same split by expected output is a far narrower .325 to .330. Read it as a modest boost to the next two weeks, not a promise, and note that most of those upcoming starters are still unannounced.
Bregman’s manager, Craig Counsell, framed the turnaround as a matter of work: “It’s a credit to how he works every single day, and is just relentless with his search to be himself and to be the best version of himself. He will never give you an inch on that.” The evidence agrees with the destination more than the popular route to it. This is not a hitter who found something new. It’s one who found himself again, an elite eye and restored timing dragging his line back to where it belonged, and whose home runs, for the moment, are arriving a little faster than the contact says they should. The next test is simple: watch whether the barrels rise to meet the slugging, or the slugging settles back to the barrels. ```
