Game Preview of Chicago Bears @ Washington Commanders. Week 6 of 2025 NFL Season
It’s Bears at Commanders on Monday night at Northwest Stadium, Oct. 13, 8:15 PM ET. Two second-year quarterbacks lead the show. Caleb Williams brings a big-play profile. Jayden Daniels adds speed and stress for defenses if he’s healthy.
Chicago’s defense is streaky but dangerous on key downs. They stop 70% of third downs, the best rate in our 2025 sample. The flip side: they’ve leaked explosive runs. That’s where Daniels’ legs and Washington’s backs can tilt the field, if the questionable tags clear.
Injuries hang over this matchup. Daniels is questionable with a leg issue. So are wideouts Terry McLaurin and Deebo Samuel Sr. Chicago lists D’Andre Swift, Cole Kmet, and LT Darnell Wright as questionable. Availability could swing the script and the total.
The market sets a clear lean to Washington at home, but not a blowout. Our anchor spread sits at Commanders -4.5. The total is pinned at 50.0, which signals scoring chances on both sides if quarterbacks are near full strength.
| Date | Opponent | Result | ATS | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-05 | @ LAC | W 27-10 | W +2.5 | u47.5 |
| 2025-09-28 | @ ATL | L 27-34 | L 2.5 | o43.5 |
| 2025-09-21 | vs LV | W 41-24 | W +2.5 | o43.5 |
| 2025-09-11 | @ GB | L 18-27 | L 3.5 | u48.5 |
| 2025-09-07 | vs NYG | W 21-6 | W +6.0 | u45.5 |
| 2025-01-26 | @ PHI | L 23-55 | L 6.0 | o46.5 |
| 2025-01-18 | @ DET | W 45-31 | W +8.5 | o55.5 |
| 2025-01-12 | @ TB | W 23-20 | P 3.0 | u51.5 |
| 2025-01-05 | @ DAL | W 23-19 | W +-7.0 | u43.5 |
| 2024-12-29 | vs ATL | W 30-24 | W +3.5 | o46.5 |
Bears win third downs on defense. Chicago’s third-down stop rate is 70.0% (best percentile) on a 40-play sample, which can stall long Commanders drives.
Explosive runs can beat Chicago. The Bears allow explosive runs at a 6.8% clip (poor percentile). That invites QB keeps and RB cutbacks if Washington’s backs suit up.
Chicago’s scoring pops on big plays. Big-play TD rate is 31.3% on 16 big plays (small sample). The Bears don’t need 12-play marches to score.
Bears offense tilts under center. Chicago lines up under center 59.0% (high percentile). That sets up play-action shots to isolate corners.
Injury-driven volatility. Washington’s offense changes a lot if Daniels or McLaurin sit. Chicago’s run game and protection change if Swift or LT Darnell Wright can’t go.
Spread anchor: Commanders -4.5 at -106. Washington gets the home bump, while Chicago’s run-D weakness raises the ceiling for QB/RB rushing if the Qs play.
Total anchor: 50.0 (Over -101 / Under -115). Quarterback health is the swing. Over leans if Daniels and key WRs are active; Under has value if news breaks the other way.
Commanders team total: 27.5 (Over -111 / Under -109). Bears allow explosive runs; Washington’s red-zone profile could push four TDs if the offense is intact.
Bears team total: 22.5 (Over -122 / Under +100). Chicago’s big-play TD rate keeps the Over live, but juice is heavy on 22.5 Over.
Anytime TD market shows paths: Swift -101 (Q), Croskey-Merritt -101 (Q), Jayden Daniels +148 (Q), Rome Odunze +172. Q-tags mean news matters; price risk is baked in.
Washington is favored by a field goal plus a hook for a reason. The Commanders can punish Chicago’s run defense with QB keepers and a rotating backfield, if the health report cooperates. Their home field also matters in prime time.
Chicago isn’t toothless. The Bears’ defense wins third downs, and the offense can score in chunks. That combo can keep them inside the number if Williams hits two or three explosives.
Our numbers anchor at Commanders -4.5 and total 50.0. Bettors should watch the inactives. If Daniels and McLaurin are in, Washington’s offense lifts. If they’re out or limited, variance tilts to Chicago and to an Under lean.
Play the prices, not the helmets. The juice on several markets is real. Tie any bet to the final injury report and be ready to pivot.
| Statistic | Offense | Rank | Defense | Rank | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Points | 134 | #8 | 117 | #13 | |
| Total Points Per Game | 26.8 | #8 | 29.3 | #28 | |
| Total Touchdowns | 15 | #9 | 14 | #21 | |
| Passing Touchdowns | 7 | #22 | 10 | #25 | |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 7 | #4 | 4 | #12 | |
| Other Touchdowns | 1 | #10 | 0 | #12 | |
| Total Kicking Points | 40 | #11 | 29 | #26 | |
| Total Two Point Conversions | 2 | #2 | 2 | #3 | |
| Kick Extra Points | 13 | #10 | 11 | #18 |
| Statistic | Offense | Rank | Defense | Rank | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Passing Yards | 963 | #20 | 860 | #28 | |
| Net Passing Yards Per Game | 193 | #23 | 215 | #16 | |
| Passer Rating | 95.3 | #17 | 99.5 | #12 | |
| Passing Attempts | 146 | #24 | 114 | #2 | |
| Completions | 89 | #27 | 84 | #31 | |
| Completion Percentage | 61 | #29 | 73.7 | #31 | |
| Passing 1st downs | 45 | #27 | 40 | #4 | |
| Passing 1st Down % | 46.9 | #29 | 50.6 | #8 | |
| Longest Pass | 56 | #14 | 64 | #10 | |
| Passing Fumbles Lost | 0 | #25 | 0 | #31 | |
| Receiving Targets | 134 | #25 | 112 | #31 | |
| Receptions | 89 | #27 | 84 | #2 | |
| Receiving Yards After Catch | 450 | #26 | 442 | #7 | |
| YAC Average | 5.1 | #13 | 5.3 | #22 |
| Statistic | Offense | Rank | Defense | Rank | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rushing Yards | 782 | #1 | 658 | #24 | |
| Rushing Yards Per Game | 156 | #1 | 164 | #2 | |
| Rushing Attempts | 133 | #13 | 107 | #5 | |
| Yards Per Rush Attempt | 5.9 | #1 | 6.2 | #1 | 🏈 |
| Rushing 1st downs | 38 | #6 | 32 | #17 | |
| 20+ Yard Rushing Plays | 6 | #1 | 6 | #2 | |
| Long Rushing | 60 | #8 | 64 | #7 | |
| Rushing Fumbles | 6 | #1 | 6 | #2 | |
| Rushing Fumbles Lost | 2 | #5 | 2 | #4 |